|Posted on July 23, 2013 at 8:14 AM||comments (173)|
Eye Prophylaxis: ointment or eye drops containing an antibiotic medication that are placed in a newborn's eyes.
Why was it developed? What was it supposed to treat?
“The use of erythromycin eye ointment in newborns has its roots in the late 1800s. During that time period, approximately 10% of newborns born in maternity hospitals across Europe developed ophthalmia neonatorum (ON). ON is a type of pink eye that caused blindness in 3% of infants who were affected (Schaller and Klauss 2001). This means that during the late 1800s, before antibiotics were discovered, 0.3% of infants (3 out of 1,000) were blinded from ON.
In 1881, a physician named Carl Crede realized that infants were catching ON during vaginal delivery, and that the infections were caused by gonorrhea—a sexually transmitted infection. Dr. Crede found that by putting silver nitrate in the eyes of newborn babies, he could prevent ON.
Has it been effective: has the incidence decreased because of the intervention/procedure/test?
“The number of newborn ON infections in Dr. Crede’s hospital went from 30-35 cases per year to 1 case in the first six months he started using silver nitrate.
Today, more than 130 years after Dr. Crede made his discovery, quite a few things have changed though. First, the development of antibiotics has made it possible to treat an infant who contracts ON—thus making blindness highly unlikely. Also, silver nitrate is no longer used in most developed countries, because it is highly irritating to the eye and can cause severe pain, chemical pink eye, and temporary vision impairment. Silver nitrate is also not effective with infections caused by Chlamydia, the most common cause of ON today. Furthermore, silver nitrate and tetracycline eye ointment (another antibiotic that has been used in the past to prevent ON) are no longer available in the U.S. For these reasons, 0.5% erythromycin ophthalmic ointment is used in the U.S. and Canada to prevent ON infection.”
Links to continue your research and draw your own conclusion about what is best for your family:
Randomized Trial Results published in the American Journal of Pediatrics, 1993
Is Mandatory Neonatal Eye Prophylaxis Ethically Justiﬁed? A Case Study
http://www2.cfpc.ca/local/user/files/%7BCB070CB9-FA33-4167-B903-EC10519A4EE6%7D/phe%202011%20article.pdfEye Prophylaxis in the Newborn Infant
Prophylaxis for Gonococcal and Chlamydial Ophthalmia Neonatorum
The material included on this site is for informational purposes only.
It is not intended nor implied to be a substitute for professional medical advice. The reader should always consult her or his healthcare provider to determine the appropriateness of the information for their own situation. Krystyna and Bruss Bowman and Bowman House, LLC accept no liability for the content of this site, or for the consequences of any actions taken on the basis of the information provided. This blog contains information about our classes available in Chandler, AZ and Payson, AZ and is not the official website of The Bradley Method®. The views contained on this blog do not necessarily reflect those of The Bradley Method® or the American Academy of Husband-Coached Childbirth®.